Skip Navigation

eCAM 2009 6(Supplement 1):21-29; doi:10.1093/ecam/nep079
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chae, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kwon, Y.-K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chae, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kwon, Y.-K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Psychological Profile of Sasang Typology: A Systematic Review

Han Chae1, Soo Hyun Park2, Soo Jin Lee3, Myoung-geun Kim4, Danny Wedding5 and Young-Kyu Kwon1

1Division of Longevity and Biofunctional Medicine, School of Oriental Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, 2Department of Occupational Therapy, Yonsei University, Wonju, 3Department of Psychology, Yonsei University, Seoul, 4Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea and 5Missouri Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, St Louis, MO, USA

A systematic review of studies related to the psychological characteristics of Sasang types was conducted with the goal of delineating generalizable psychological profiles based on Sasang typology, a traditional Korean medical typology with medical herbs and acupuncture that is characterized as personalized medicine. Journal articles pertaining to Sasang typology were collected using five electronic database systems in Korea and in the USA. As a result, 64 potentially relevant studies were identified and 21 peer-reviewed research articles that employed psychometric inventories were included. Beginning with the use of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory in 1992, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, NEO-Personality Inventory, Temperament and Character Inventory and other personality assessment tools were employed in the identified studies. Because data synthesis could not be carried out due to the heterogeneity of the studies, the present review article sought to delineate the mutual relevance of the studies based on research results pertaining to the correlation between the aforementioned psychological assessment instruments. Results of the review indicate that two super-factors, Extraversion and Neuroticism, serve as the foundation in regards to delineating personality constructs, such that the So-Yang type scored high on the Extraversion dimension and low on the Neuroticism dimension, while the So-Eum type scored low on the Extraversion dimension and high on the Neuroticism dimension. The present systematic review indicates that Sasang typology shares similarities with the Western psychological tradition.

Keywords: Extraversion – Neuroticism – personality profile – Sasang typology – systematic review


For reprints and all correspondence: Han Chae, KMD, PhD, Dipl.Ac., Division of Longevity and Biofunctional Medicine, School of Oriental Medicine, Pusan National University, Mulgeum, Yangsan, Kyungnam 626-770, South Korea. Tel: +82-51-510-8470; E-mail: han{at}chaelab.org

Received March 11, 2009; accepted June 4, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.